“I was excited to find out what they really thought of the treatment. Did it provide a sense of safety, or did it feel unnecessary? In a hospital environment, the focus is mostly on technical aspects,” Peter Magnusson says.
Participants in the study returned to the fact that they were enjoying life and did not want it to end, even though they were aware of their advanced age. They saw their frailty as natural and exercised as much as they could. No one regretted getting their ICD, and they felt grateful and regarded the ICD as a companion in daily life.
“One participant told us that he had an ICD shock while playing tennis, which frightened his fellow players. So, he took up bowling instead, as he didn’t view the ICD to be an obstacle to his active lifestyle,” says Peter Magnusson, who sees the ICD to a “true life insurance policy.”
The Janus-faced device
When asked if they had thought about death, most participants stated that they avoided thinking about it and focused on the present, but some expressed concern that the ICD could prolong the time before death and prevent a peaceful death.
“ICDs can be like a double-edged sword, one side can be a source of worry about life, and the other as a source of worry about death.
However, participants showed great confidence in the ICD treatment. Moreover, the ICD enabled them to feel relaxed, as they did not have to worry that something was going to happen all the time. “When the doctors suggested the ICD treatment, it felt natural for me to accept it. I said that I wanted to live!”
More knowledge is needed about life’s end
The participants conveyed a zest for life. Clearly, the ICD treatment was part of affirming life and it gave them confidence in the future. At the same time, the conversations revealed considerable ignorance about ICDs and specifically about ICD deactivation at the end of life, which some saw as equivalent to euthanasia or even physician-assisted suicide.
Many participants had not reflected on the deactivation of their ICDs before the interview itself at all. Their notions about deactivation had been vague: “I guess you push a button somewhere. It’s my wife who knows about all the buttons.” In fact, the ICD is deactivated with a magnet or by reprogramming.
“ICDs provide a sense of safety and can prolong life, and it was clear that even the very oldest appreciate their ICDs,” Peter Magnusson says.
“However, more knowledge is needed about what an ICD is and about the possibility of deactivating the device when the inevitable end draws near. Otherwise, deactivating the ICD near the end of life may cause ethical dilemmas. There is an unspoken need for more knowledge not only among patients and relatives, but also among healthcare professionals,” Peter Magnusson says.
The research team welcomes a holistic approach to ICD treatment and would like to see patients becoming involved in improving care, individually or through organisation.
Text: Douglas Öhrbom